Trump: Absurd Theater and Political Simulacrum

 “it’s not just that Trump doesn’t want to be taken literally. He doesn’t want to be taken seriously either.” (Reid Hoffman 10.10.2019, MEDIUM


] Trump as a Symbol of Absurd Theater and the Rebellion Against the Iron Cage of Rationality

In analyzing the political phenomenon surrounding Donald Trump, his rise might not be viewed traditionally. It is not just support for a political figure. Instead, it is a rebellion against the very essence of meaning in politics. Choosing Trump is akin to embracing a simulacrum of a politician. It’s an imitation that no longer points to an original. It lacks a meaningful source. Philosopher Jean Baudrillard describes “simulacrum” as a copy that has been disconnected from its source. This copy takes on a reality of its own. In this sense, Trump functions less as a conventional politician with concrete values or policies. Instead, he serves as an image. This image dismantles the significance of traditional political stances, moral values, and ideological agendas.

Trump as a simulacrum of a politician

This “simulacrum” doesn’t just represent Trump’s personal brand but highlights a shift in the entire political process. In the modern media landscape, sensationalism often trumps substance. Voters may feel drawn to figures who offer an escape from the iron cage of rationality, rules, and decorum. Trump’s presence disrupts the status quo. It evokes an emotional response that is less about policy. The reaction is more about spectacle.

Trump as an actor in the absurd Theater

Trump can also be seen as a character within the Theater of the Absurd. This genre was pioneered by playwrights like Samuel Beckett and Eugène Ionesco. It emerged in the mid-20th century.

The genre arose as a response to the perceived meaninglessness of human existence. This was in the wake of world wars and societal disillusionment. Absurd theater often abandons traditional storytelling and coherent logic, instead portraying chaotic, illogical, and often humorously tragic scenarios. Characters in these plays are often trapped in situations where their actions seem pointless. Yet, they persist. This persistence is a reflection of existential angst and the search for meaning in a world that offers none.

In this light, Trump embodies a kind of absurdity. He brings to the political stage a chaotic and unpredictable performance. Here, logic and consistency are often sidelined. They are replaced by raw emotion and spontaneous reaction. For many, his appeal lies in this break from convention. He offers an alternative to the carefully managed, bureaucratic reality. People may find this reality stifling.

We can frame Trump’s role in different ways. He can be seen as a simulacrum, a performer, or a clown in the theater of the absurd. This view sees his political persona not as a coherent set of policies. Instead, it is a mirror reflecting society’s ambivalent relationship with meaning and rationality. His political identity challenges the conventions of “truth” in political discourse. He effectively becomes an emblem of the hyperreality. Baudrillard suggests that in this realm, the line between the real and the image fades.

Escaping the Iron cage of rationality

In a society bombarded by information, people are disconnected from clear, grounded truths. Trump’s appeal is not so much his adherence to facts. Instead, he embodies a theatrical, emotionally charged option to the stale rationality of the modern political arena. In this theater, Trump is not merely a politician. He is a harbinger of a shift in the way we engage with politics. This shift moves us from the rational to the absurd. It takes us from meaning to simulacrum and from reality to performance.

“Even today, millions of Americans remain willing to abide a former president who avoids reading altogether. He simultaneously belittles history, medicine, science, and learning. What does this curious juxtaposition mean about American citizen capacities to sustain a national democracy? It’s a silly question.”

Absurdity, Trump and the American presidency – opinion

Trump’s simplifying cultural context offered millions of Americans an ill-founded kind of reassurance.

By LOUIS RENÉ BERESJULY 24, 2022 22:17


Conclusion:

I hope this post resonates with American voters. It should encourage reflection on the deeper dynamics at play in our political landscape. Trump’s appeal may indeed indicate a shift from rational, policy-driven politics. It turns into a spectacle that captures emotions and escapes the “iron cage” of rationality. By viewing his role through the lens of simulacrum and absurd theater, I wanted to explore his influence. It extends beyond typical political motivations. It becomes a symbolic escape from the structures of modern life.

How do you feel about this analysis of Trump? Do you see his appeal as a rebellion against conventional politics, or perhaps as something else entirely? I invite you to share your thoughts in the comments—your perspectives are crucial in deepening this conversation.

Further reading

Max Weber’s work The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1905) is highly relevant. It supports your view on Trump’s election as a symbolic escape from the “iron cage of rationality.” Weber discusses how modern society is structured around efficiency and bureaucracy. This structure forms a rigid framework. It limits individual freedom and creativity. The “iron cage” represents this constrained, rationalized society where individuals are bound by impersonal institutions and protocols.

Colin Crouch’s Post-Democracy (2004) further contextualizes this idea in modern politics. Leaders like Trump rely on spectacle and emotional appeal. They resonate with voters who feel disconnected from the overly bureaucratic and rationalized systems that shape contemporary life. Crouch argues that in a “post-democratic” society, politics focuses on personality and performance. It prioritizes these over policy or ideology. This appeals to a public eager for leaders who challenge the political status quo.

https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Post-Democracy-p-9780745633152

You can explore Weber’s The Protestant Ethic here on Marxists.org,

and you may find Post-Democracy through various academic libraries for a more modern take. These works together help frame Trump’s popularity as an emotional and symbolic departure from rationalized structures.

Leave a Reply