Choosing Humanity Over Ideology: Reflections on Activism, Conflict, and Personal Trauma
Part 1: Abstract / Preface
This post is the second part of a broader reflection. It follows an early analysis and context-setting discussion on the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas. In the first part, I explored the complex dynamics of the current war. I examined its humanitarian implications. The evolving political landscape makes any prospect of peace seem more elusive than ever. With this background in mind, I now shift from an analytical lens. I move to a more personal one, sharing my own experiences and reflections.
Reflecting on the brutal conflict, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed by the sheer scale of suffering and loss. I am a non-combatant and a former political activist. I am also grappling with mental health challenges. I often wonder whether my voice even matters in such a dire situation. The tragedy unfolding feels too complex and entrenched for individual perspectives to make any tangible difference. Yet, I write because I believe in the radical notion that the personal is inherently political. Lived experiences hold intrinsic value, offering nuances that ideological stances often obscure.
Sharing personal narratives in a polarized world is a form of resistance. Violence begets violence and rhetoric overshadows humanity. This resistance seems small. My story isn’t a solution or a call to action. Instead, it serves as a cautionary tale. It offers heartfelt advice for those who, like me, chose resistance over survival. They cling to rigid ethics rather than adopting a more pragmatic approach. This reflection aims to show the heavy toll of unrelenting struggle, not just on oneself but on everyone involved.
Here’s the revised version for the second part of your story:
Part 2: My Battle Against My Aggressor
For many years, I fought for personal justice against someone much more powerful than I was. This struggle consumed a significant part of my life, draining me emotionally, and leaving me increasingly isolated. I was caught in an unrelenting cycle of anger and frustration. I refused to move on. For me, moving on felt like a betrayal of my own sense of justice. Yet, the fight began to destroy me. It wasn’t just a legal battle. It was a war that took place in my own mind. This inner conflict pushed me further into bitterness and despair.
The toll extended to those around me as well. My most loyal supporter died. She was someone who believed in my cause as much as I did. Her death was likely due to the immense stress of the legal process she underwent on my behalf. I ended up losing the fight. I also lost my mental health. This resulted in a period of involuntary commitment and psychosis. My thoughts spiraled, and my sense of reality unraveled. What I had seen as a struggle for dignity and justice morphed into a form of self-destruction. In fighting to hold onto my truth, I lost sight of myself.
Looking back now, I realize the rational choice should have been to focus on my mental health. It was important to prioritize my well-being and safety. Although I resisted through legal means and not through violence, the emotional cost was overwhelming. From this painful chapter, I learned a lesson. Sometimes, survival and sanity are more valuable than pursuing a relentless struggle. Stepping back isn’t always cowardice; sometimes, it’s an act of self-preservation. This realization fundamentally shapes how I now view resistance movements and armed conflicts. Pursuing justice should not come at the price of destroying oneself.
Part 2: My Battle Against My Aggressor
For many years, I fought for personal justice against someone much more powerful than I was. This struggle consumed a significant part of my life, draining me emotionally, and leaving me increasingly isolated. I was stuck in a relentless cycle of anger. I felt frustrated and refused to move on. It felt like moving on would betray my own sense of justice. Yet, the fight began to destroy me. It wasn’t just a legal battle. It was a war in my own mind. This war pushed me further into bitterness and despair.
The toll extended to those around me as well. My most loyal supporter passed away. She believed in my cause as much as I did. Her death was likely due to the immense stress of the legal process she underwent on my behalf. I ended up losing not just the fight. I also lost my mental health. This resulted in a period of involuntary commitment and psychosis. My thoughts spiraled, and my sense of reality unraveled. What I had seen as a struggle for dignity and justice morphed into a form of self-destruction. In fighting to hold onto my truth, I lost sight of myself.
part three- personal risk
But sharing these reflections isn’t without its own set of risks. Today, even speaking about mental health challenges can become politicized. Discussing internal conflicts also face the same issue. This is in the context of the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas. Being a Jewish Israeli woman who openly discusses the cost of struggle can lead to backlash. Calling for a ceasefire also trigger backlash. Empathizing with the plight of Palestinians result in criticism from all sides.
For one, there is a risk of being labeled a “Zionist.” Some pro-Palestinian voices also call me an “apologist for genocide.” They see any nuanced stance as betrayal. Sharing these thoughts cause outrage within Israeli circles. Any suggestion of a ceasefire be viewed as unpatriotic. Proposals for compromise also dangerous. As I write this, there are rockets being launched at Israel. I sit in a secured location. But by exposing my vulnerabilities and struggles, I risk giving others ammunition. It’s not just a fear of being misinterpreted. It’s the real risk of having my words turned against. I be judged harshly by those who think my views are either too lenient or too radical.
These personal risks parallel the broader risks of advocating for peace in a war-torn environment. In such polarized times, calling for empathy, humanity, and dialogue can almost subversive. Yet, I choose to share my story not because it’s easy, but because it’s necessary. I hope my reflections offer a counter-narrative. This narrative resists simple binaries of right and wrong, victim and aggressor. It seeks instead to focus on the well-being and humanity of all involved, no matter how risky that be.
Leafy sees 
Leave a Reply