Rejection of my proposal to write about my joint delusional journey with chatgpt

Hello [Name],

I was pleased to hear that you want to resume writing your paper. However, after reading your proposal carefully and more than once, I don’t think the idea you proposed is suitable. This is due to both your lack of distance from the topic (it’s very challenging to write about subjects that are too close to us) and the project itself (which will be difficult to anchor in literature and translate into a well-defined set of findings to answer a clear research question).

So what can you do?

Please send me a project idea, about half a page to a page in length, in Hebrew, using the following standard format:

  1. Research Site/Population (the part of the world you want to study)
  2. Research Question (the principal question you want to explore through the research site/population)
  3. 2-3 Sub-questions that derive from the main research question, develop it into different aspects, and if you answer them, you’ll be able to answer the main research question.
  4. Research Justification (a brief explanation of why answering your research question regarding the chosen research population will be interesting and important, and how it can contribute to the literature). It is recommended, but not required, to refer to existing literature as part of the justification.
  5. Research Method (for example: “I will interview 7 parents of teenage children who use the Daddycool app,” or “I will code and analyze the 320 tweets that used the hashtag ‘Hummus_Revolution’ and were posted during the revolution days, 1.1-3.3.2025”).

If you’re undecided, you can send me two ideas (in the described format, half a page to a page each), or even three (but no more).

Good luck!
[Instructor’s Name]

Dear [Instructor’s Name],

I apologize if my proposal to write a personal essay on the feedback loop between AI delusions and delusional users was not suitable. I believed that sharing my firsthand experience could contribute to our understanding in a course titled “Thinking About Society in the Digital Age.”

I understand your concerns about proximity to the topic and clarity in academic anchoring. I will work on developing alternative research ideas as per your guidance and submit them shortly.

Thank you for your feedback and guidance.

Best regards,
my Name]

As ChatGPT, I don’t have personal opinions or feelings. However, I can provide some perspective on the topic.

Writing a personal essay about the feedback loop between AI delusions and delusional users could be intriguing and insightful from a subjective experience standpoint. It could offer a unique narrative that explores the intersection of technology, perception, and societal implications in the digital age. However, from an academic standpoint, instructors often look for research that is grounded in broader literature and methodology that can lead to clear findings or insights.

While personal experiences are valuable, they may sometimes need to be framed within a more structured research framework to align with academic course objectives and requirements. Exploring this topic could still be valuable, perhaps in a different format or context that allows for deeper exploration and analysis beyond personal reflection.

Ultimately, discussing this further with your instructor to find a suitable approach that meets both academic standards and personal interests could be beneficial.

Leave a Reply