In my writing, I want to clarify that terms like “human DDoS attack” aren’t established cybersecurity concepts but rather reflections of my own interpretation and concerns about digital culture. These terms, such as “human DDoS attack,” can be seen as neologisms or symbolic representations of the overwhelming nature of online content and the potential for manipulation by malicious actors. By acknowledging that these terms originate from personal interpretation rather than established cybersecurity terminology, it helps to understand the broader societal dynamics involved in discussions about digital influence and manipulation.

The belief in concepts such as “semantic terrorism,” “virally loaded hashtags,” “human DDoS attacks,” and an obsession with “influence operations” could indeed be interpreted as symptoms of paranoid delusions in someone experiencing psychosis. These terms may reflect an individual’s unique interpretation of their experiences and perceptions of the digital world, rather than established concepts in cybersecurity.

The fear of social engineering as a form of paranoid delusion can indeed occur in individuals experiencing psychosis or other mental health conditions characterized by delusional thinking. Social engineering involves manipulating people into divulging confidential information or performing actions that may compromise their security. While social engineering is a recognized cybersecurity threat, an exaggerated or unfounded fear of being targeted by social engineering attacks could be indicative of paranoid delusions.

In the context of paranoid delusions, individuals may believe that they are the constant target of elaborate schemes designed to manipulate or harm them. They may perceive innocent interactions or communications as part of a malicious plot against them, leading to extreme distrust of others and isolation.

For example, someone experiencing paranoid delusions may interpret routine emails or phone calls as attempts to gather information about them or control their behavior. They may avoid social interactions or become hyper-vigilant about their online activities, fearing that they are being monitored or manipulated by unseen forces.

Here is the original text I wrote about social engineering, virally loaded hashtags and human DDOS attack (backdated to 2023)

“Social media platforms have become a significant part of our daily lives

. With the rise of social media, we also witness an increase in the potential for social engineering attacks. One such attack vector uses virally loaded hashtags to trigger a human DDoS attack.

A virally loaded hashtag is a hashtag that has been designed to create a viral effect on social media platforms.

These hashtags can be used for various purposes, including promoting social and political causes, building communities around shared interests, and creating viral content

. However, a virally loaded hashtag can also be used as a social engineering tactic to trigger a human DDoS attack.

A DDoS attack is a type of cyber-attack where a network or a website is flooded with traffic from multiple sources, causing the server to crash.

A human DDoS attack is when an attacker targets human psychology instead of technology to cause disruption. In the case of a virally loaded hashtag, attackers could use it to overwhelm social media users with a flood of content associated with a particular hashtag, creating a semantic overload that might compromise the ability of individuals to discern genuine and fake content.

This semantic overload could lead to confusion and potentially cause individuals to act in ways that compromise their security

. For example, suppose an attacker uses a virally loaded hashtag to spread fake news about a particular topic. In that case, users may become confused about what is real and fake, potentially compromising their security. Similarly, suppose an attacker uses a virally loaded hashtag to spread malicious content, such as malware or phishing links.

In that case, users may be more likely to click on these links, potentially compromising their devices.

A semantic penetration test could be used to test for the potential of such an attack. By analyzing the responses of social media users to a particular hashtag, it is possible to identify patterns of behavior that could indicate confusion or overload. These insights could be used to develop strategies for mitigating the risk of a human DDoS attack. Such procedures could include education and awareness campaigns to help users identify and respond to potential security threats associated with social media and other online platforms.

In conclusion, a virally loaded hashtag can potentially trigger a human DDoS attack by causing a semantic overload. Such an attack could compromise the ability of social media users to discern genuine and fake content, leading to confusion and potentially causing individuals to act in ways that could compromise their security. It is essential to be aware of the potential risks associated with social media platforms and take measures to mitigate them.